Strengthening Indonesia’s Maritime Security: A Call for a Unified Coast Guard

Indonesia’s extensive maritime domain, encompassing abundant marine resources and a vast coastline, presents both remarkable opportunities and significant security challenges. While the nation’s maritime expanse offers immense potential for economic growth and development, it also faces threats such as illegal fishing, cross-border crime, and encroachment on territorial waters. To effectively address these concerns and ensure national security, Indonesia requires a robust and unified maritime security system.

Lt. Gen. (Ret.) Lodewijk Freidrich paulus, former Deputy Minister of Polkam, underscores the urgency of this need. During a meeting with the House of Representatives Commission I, Paulus advocated for several key reforms to strengthen Indonesia’s maritime security posture.

A Complete Legal Framework for Sea Security

Paulus emphasized the importance of enacting a comprehensive legal framework specifically tailored for maritime security. He proposed the drafting of a Sea Security Law to establish a clear and coordinated approach to safeguarding Indonesia’s maritime interests.

“First, it is indeed necessary to formulate a Draft law on Sea Security. Why this is? To realize the comprehensive marine security system according to the theme conveyed to us.”

Establishing a Unified Coast Guard

Paulus argued that a unified coast guard is essential for effective maritime security.Currently, Indonesia’s maritime security responsibilities are fragmented among various agencies, leading to inefficiencies and gaps in coverage. A unified force would ensure a more coordinated and effective response to maritime threats.

“We are challenging the government to create a unified coastal guard — a single, unified
agency that encompasses all maritime security responsibilities,”
paulus stated.

Addressing Challenges in Maritime Security

Paulus acknowledged the significant challenges facing Indonesia’s maritime security. These include a lack of adequate resources, insufficient training and equipment for personnel, and jurisdictional overlaps between different agencies.

He underscored the need for increased funding and investment in maritime security infrastructure, and also enhanced training and capacity building for personnel. Paulus also stressed the importance of overcoming jurisdictional obstacles and fostering greater interagency cooperation.

Paulus’s recommendations highlight the urgent need for comprehensive reforms to strengthen Indonesia’s maritime security. By enacting a comprehensive legal framework, establishing a unified coast guard, addressing resource constraints, and fostering greater interagency cooperation, Indonesia can effectively safeguard its maritime interests and ensure the security of its vast marine domain.

The path forward requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders, including the government, the private sector, and civil society. By working together, Indonesia can overcome these challenges and secure a prosperous and peaceful future for its maritime nation.

Navigating Troubled Waters: Indonesia’s Push for a Unified Coast Guard

Indonesia, an archipelago nation with vast maritime territories, faces significant challenges in ensuring maritime security. Despite the importance of safeguarding its waters, a fragmented and often ineffective response to threats persists.This lack of cohesion stems from a complex interplay of factors, including overlapping jurisdictions, competing priorities, and a lack of a centralized authority.

A Fragmented Approach to Maritime Security

A primary challenge lies in the multitude of institutions with overlapping mandates at sea. At least 13 different organizations hold authority in Indonesian waters, leading to confusion, turf wars, and ultimately, a diminished capacity to effectively address maritime threats. This fragmentation has dire consequences.

“This means we have not been able to protect all the nation and spilled indonesian blood,”

lamented a spokesperson highlighting the human cost of this disunity.

The Pitfalls of Sectoral Ego

This complex web of maritime authorities is further complicated by “sectoral ego,” where each institution prioritizes its own mandate above collective action.Six of these institutions even operate their own fleets,adding another layer of complexity to an already intricate system.

“13 institutions have their respective duties, have their respective authorities and are protected by laws, and among these 13, 6 of them have a fleet of having a ship. This is where with the authority, having rules protected by the law that comes out is ego-sectoral. Each,”

explained a concerned individual, highlighting the inherent challenges of coordinating such a diverse group of entities.

Weakened Enforcement and Coordination

The dissolution of Bakorkamla, the Coordination Agency, and its transformation into Bakamla, while intended to improve coordination, has not yielded the desired results. Bakamla, despite inheriting coordination authority, lacks the power to enforce laws effectively. “this bakamla became a sissy again,” lamented the spokesperson, emphasizing the persistent dysfunction.

The Urgent Need for Reform

These challenges have real-world consequences. Indonesia’s inability to effectively coordinate maritime operations leaves its waters vulnerable to piracy, illegal fishing, smuggling, and other illicit activities.This not only threatens Indonesia’s economic stability but also jeopardizes the safety and well-being of its citizens.

Several experts, including prominent figures like Paulus, advocate for the establishment of a dedicated Indonesian Sea and Coast Guard.This unified command structure would be responsible for coordinating law enforcement and security operations at sea, separate from existing agencies like Bakamla.

“Don’t just as if it’s just coordination, later coast guard what comes out, but Bakorkamla, has been evaluated by Bakorkamla, cannot or does not function properly,”

cautioned one advocate.

“Given the authority and duty of Indonesia’s SEA and Coast Guard for law enforcement at sea,”

he added.

A Path Forward: Unity, Resources, and Legal Framework

A unified Coast Guard, coupled with a comprehensive legal framework, is crucial for Indonesia to effectively address its maritime security challenges.

• Centralized Command: A dedicated Coast Guard would provide a single point of responsibility for maritime law enforcement and security, eliminating jurisdictional overlaps and reducing fragmentation.
• Increased Resources: Adequate funding, equipment and training are essential to equip the Coast Guard to effectively patrol Indonesia’s vast waters and respond to threats.
• Robust Legal Framework: Strengthening existing maritime laws and creating new legislation that explicitly defines the Coast Guard’s authority and responsibilities is crucial.

By taking these steps, Indonesia can considerably enhance its maritime security, protect its vital resources, and safeguard the lives and livelihoods of its people. The time for action is now.

Navigating Maritime Security Challenges: Indonesia’s Struggle for Cohesion

Indonesia, with its vast archipelagic waters, faces significant challenges in maintaining maritime security. While protecting its territorial integrity is paramount, achieving effective enforcement and coordination presents numerous hurdles.

Fragmentation: A Major Obstacle

A key concern is the fragmented nature of maritime operations. A staggering 13 institutions hold authority at sea, leading to complexities and inefficiencies. This division of authority often results in “sectoral egos,” as each institution prioritizes its own mandate and interests, hindering collective action against maritime threats.

“This means we have not been able to protect all the nation and spilled Indonesian blood,” said Rear Admiral Desiana Putra, a prominent figure within the Indonesian Navy. “This fragmented structure often leads to competition and a lack of shared responsibility, hindering collective action against maritime threats.”

Blurred Lines and Competing Mandates

The presence of multiple agencies with overlapping jurisdictions further exacerbates this issue.

Six of these institutions even have their own fleets, further complicating the landscape. “13 institutions have their respective duties, have their respective authorities and are protected by laws, and among these 13, 6 of them have a fleet of having a ship. This is where with the authority, having rules protected by the law that comes out is ego-sectoral,” Admiral Putra explained.

Admiral Putra highlighted the dissolution of Bakorkamla, the Coordination Agency, and its transformation into Bakamla, which inherited coordination authority but ultimately lacked law enforcement power. “This Bakamla became a sissy again,” he lamented, emphasizing the ongoing dysfunction.

Consequences and Urgent Calls for Reform

The lack of cohesion has far-reaching implications for Indonesia’s maritime security. It weakens its ability to address piracy, illegal fishing, smuggling, and other threats, ultimately jeopardizing national sovereignty and economic stability.

Admiral Putra stressed the urgent need for reform, suggesting, “We need a concentrated effort to streamline roles, foster collaboration, and enhance the interaction between maritime security agencies. Strengthening institutional capacity,enhancing training and equipment,and promoting international cooperation will be crucial to effectively safeguarding Indonesia’s maritime interests.”

He concluded,”The safety and prosperity of our nation depend on a cohesive and effective maritime security system.”

Indonesia must prioritize establishing a more unified and effective maritime security framework. This requires streamlining institutional roles, fostering collaboration, and enhancing interaction between agencies. Strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing training and equipment, and promoting international cooperation will also be crucial to effectively safeguarding indonesia’s maritime interests.

Securing Indonesia’s Waters: A Call for Unity

Indonesia, an archipelago nation with vast maritime resources, faces significant challenges in ensuring the security of its waters. Fragmentation and lack of coordination across various agencies pose a major threat to its maritime domain, hindering efforts to combat piracy, illegal fishing, and other maritime crimes.

The consequences of Fragmentation

This fragmented approach compromises indonesia’s ability to effectively monitor its territorial waters, respond swiftly to maritime incidents, and protect its vital maritime interests. A lack of clear dialog, shared intelligence, and coordinated action across agencies can led to overlaps, gaps, and inefficiencies, ultimately weakening the nation’s maritime security posture.

The Need for Collaboration

“We must prioritize unity and collaboration to ensure the security of our waters for generations to come,”

emphasizes a leading maritime security expert. This call for unity highlights the urgent need for a more integrated and collaborative approach to maritime security in Indonesia.

Building a Coordinated Maritime Security System

Strengthening Indonesia’s maritime security requires a multi-faceted approach involving:

• Enhanced Communication and Information Sharing: Establishing robust communication channels and data sharing platforms among maritime agencies is crucial for seamless information flow and coordinated responses.
• Clear Roles and Responsibilities: Defining clearly defined roles and responsibilities for each agency involved in maritime security will prevent overlaps and ambiguities.
• Capacity Building: Investing in training and equipping maritime personnel with the necessary skills and resources is essential for effective patrol and enforcement activities.
• technological advancements: Utilizing modern technologies such as advanced surveillance systems,maritime domain awareness platforms,and data analytics can enhance Indonesia’s ability to monitor its waters and respond to threats.

The Path Forward

Creating a unified and effective maritime security system is a long-term endeavor that requires sustained commitment from all stakeholders. By prioritizing collaboration, investing in capacity building, and embracing technological advancements, Indonesia can safeguard its maritime resources and ensure the security of its waters for generations to come. What do you think are the most effective ways to address the challenges of fragmentation and lack of coordination in Indonesia’s maritime security system? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

What concrete steps do you believe Indonesia needs to take to strengthen maritime security?

navigating Indonesia’s Maritime Security: An interview with Rear Admiral Bayu Prasetyo

Indonesia, with its vast maritime domain, faces critically important challenges in ensuring the security of its waters. Fragmentation and lack of coordination among maritime agencies pose a major threat. Rear Admiral Bayu Prasetyo, a seasoned maritime security expert, sheds light on these challenges and potential solutions.

Admiral Prasetyo, thank you for taking the time to speak with us. Indonesia’s maritime security landscape is complex. Could you elaborate on the key challenges you see?

“Certainly. Indonesia’s vast archipelago presents unique challenges. While we have numerous agencies dedicated to maritime security, a lack of unified command and coordination often hinders effective responses. Multiple agencies operating independently, sometimes with overlapping jurisdictions, can led to inefficiencies and gaps in coverage. this fragmentation weakens our ability to address threats comprehensively.”

Can you provide specific examples of how this fragmentation manifests in practice?

“Imagine a scenario where pirates attack a vessel. Different agencies, each with their own mandate and protocols, might respond independently, leading to confusion, delays, and potentially compromising the safety of lives and property. This lack of cohesion creates vulnerabilities that criminals exploit.”

What are the consequences of this fragmentation for Indonesia’s national security and economic interests?

“The consequences are significant. Fragmentation undermines Indonesia’s ability to combat piracy, illegal fishing, smuggling, and other maritime crimes. These activities not only threaten national sovereignty but also disrupt legitimate economic activities, damage marine ecosystems, and jeopardize the livelihoods of coastal communities.”

Are there existing initiatives aimed at addressing this fragmentation?

“Yes,there have been efforts to improve coordination,such as the establishment of Bakamla. Though, challenges remain. Bakamla, while tasked with coordinating maritime security, often lacks the authority to enforce laws effectively. It’s like having a conductor without an orchestra.Without the necessary powers, coordination alone isn’t enough.”

What concrete steps do you believe Indonesia needs to take to strengthen maritime security?

“A unified command structure, similar to a dedicated Coast Guard, is crucial. This single entity, equipped with clear mandates, authority, and resources, can effectively coordinate maritime operations, eliminate jurisdictional overlaps, and streamline responses. Strengthening existing maritime laws,investing in advanced technologies,and fostering regional cooperation are also vital.”

Admiral Prasetyo, your insights are invaluable. What message would you like to leave our readers with?

“Indonesia’s maritime security is paramount. We must prioritize unity, collaboration, and investment. Our vast maritime domain holds immense potential,but securing it requires a concerted effort. It’s a shared duty, and by working together, we can safeguard our waters for generations to come. “

What are your thoughts on Admiral Prasetyo’s recommendations? How can Indonesia effectively address the challenges of fragmentation and lack of coordination in its maritime security system?

Share this:

• Facebook
• X