The Lahore High Court ordered the release of Parvez Elahi. Lahore High Court heard the petition filed against the arrest of Parvez Elahi in NAB. Justice Amjad Rafique heard the petition of Pervez Elahi.
During the hearing, Justice Amjad Rafiq said that there will be an inquiry into the arrest of Parvez Elahi, when the decision of the two-member bench was reached, then why the physical remand was extended. happened Lawyer Pervaiz Elahi requested the court that there is a lot of crowd outside the High Court, there is fear that the police will arrest them.
Justice Amjad Rafiq replied that we have said that we will not arrest in any case, I am also ordering the rest. Pervaiz Elahi had challenged the NAB arrest in the High Court. The court had ordered Parvez Elahi to appear before the court at ten o’clock.
NAB Lahore had written a letter to IG Punjab and others for Parvaizalhi’s security.
Earlier, a hearing was held in the Lahore High Court on the petition filed against the arrest of former Chief Minister Chaudhry Pervez Elahi by NAB. Justice Amjad Rafiq heard the request of Pervaiz Elahi.
During the hearing, the NAB prosecutor said that time should be given for a detailed response to Chaudhry Parvez Elahi’s request, Justice Amjad Rafiq remarked that it is fine, then we order Parvez Elahi to be deported.
The court told the NAB officials that you should request the Chief Justice that this request be fixed for hearing before a 2-member bench. Is the arrest of the former Chief Minister of Punjab in accordance with the law?, all the questions are to be answered in your reports.
The NAB prosecutor argued that the single bench did not give a direction not to arrest Parvaiz Elahi.
The Prosecutor General said that it is in the decisions of the Supreme Court that a two-member bench can hear the cases of NAB, a single bench cannot hear the cases of NAB, it is the work of the subordinate courts to implement the decisions of the Supreme Court. Give respite, we will submit a full detailed report to the court.
The NAB prosecutor objected to the appearance of Amjad Parvez on behalf of Parvez Elahi and said that Amjad Parvez does not have a power of attorney in this case.
The court remarked that it seems like this is a personal matter of yours. The NAB prosecutor said that Amjad Parvez himself is the special prosecutor of NAB, how can he appear?
Amjad Pervez said that I represent NAB only in specific cases. Justice Amjad Rafiq said you should start the arguments, the court is giving permission, if you want me not to hear this case, then apply to the Chief Justice.
Justice Amjad Rafiq remarked that the arrest of Parvez Elahi is in accordance with the law, when the two-member bench restored the decision of the single bench, then the decision of the single bench is upheld, the law is very clear in this regard, we have to decide now. Parvez Elahi’s arrest is legal or illegal.
Lahore High Court ordered to present former Chief Minister Punjab and PTI leader Chaudhry Pervez Elahi in court at 2 pm, however NAB decided not to present Chaudhry Pervez Elahi in court.
It should be noted that Chaudhry Parvez Elahi has requested NAB to declare his arrest as illegal.
#Lahore #High #Court #ordered #release #PTI #President #Pervaiz #Elahi
What implications might this court ruling have on the future actions of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) in handling similar cases involving political figures?
**Interview with Legal Expert on Parvez Elahi’s Court Ruling**
**Host:** Welcome to our program. Today, we’re discussing the recent ruling by the Lahore High Court regarding the release of former Chief Minister Chaudhry Parvez Elahi. Joining us is legal expert Dr. Sarah Khan, who will provide insights into the implications of this decision. Welcome, Dr. Khan.
**Dr. Khan:** Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
**Host:** Let’s start with the basics. Can you explain the circumstances that led to Parvez Elahi’s arrest and subsequent release by the Lahore High Court?
**Dr. Khan:** Of course. Parvez Elahi was arrested by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) amid allegations related to corruption. However, he challenged this arrest in the Lahore High Court, arguing that the legal procedures weren’t followed properly. Justice Amjad Rafique of the Lahore High Court heard his petition and importantly noted that there would be an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding his arrest. This inquiry will scrutinize whether extending Elahi’s physical remand was justified.
**Host:** During the hearing, Justice Rafique emphasized the need for a fair process. What were his main concerns regarding the NAB’s actions?
**Dr. Khan:** Justice Rafique raised significant concerns about the legality of the arrest and the extension of the physical remand. He questioned the NAB prosecutor on why such measures were taken without sufficient legal basis. Moreover, Elahi’s lawyer expressed fears for their safety outside the court due to potential police action. The justice reassured them, indicating that no arrests should occur until the matter is resolved.
**Host:** That must have been a tense situation outside the court. How did the court address the safety concerns presented by Elahi’s lawyer?
**Dr. Khan:** The court took those concerns seriously. Justice Rafique ordered that Elahi should be provided adequate security, a clear acknowledgment of the potential risks involved. This demonstrates the court’s role not only in legal adjudication but also in ensuring the physical safety of individuals involved in high-stakes cases.
**Host:** Considering the court’s ruling, what does this mean for the ongoing investigations by the NAB and the legal framework surrounding such arrests in Pakistan?
**Dr. Khan:** The ruling marks a critical moment in terms of accountability and the rule of law in Pakistan. It signals that the judiciary is willing to challenge arbitrary actions by bodies like the NAB. This could lead to greater scrutiny of such agencies and reinforce the requirements for due process, which is imperative in maintaining public trust in legal institutions.
**Host:** Thank you, Dr. Khan, for your insights. It will be interesting to see how this case evolves and what it means for other political figures facing similar legal challenges in Pakistan.
**Dr. Khan:** Thank you for having me.
**Host:** And thank you to our audience for tuning in. We’ll keep you updated on further developments in this significant case.
