Russia’s Kursk Equipment Shift: Tanks to Trucks, a Boon for Ukraine – Forbes

Russia’s Kursk Equipment Shift:  Tanks to Trucks, a Boon for Ukraine – Forbes

Russian Army Facing New Equipment Challenges in Kursk

Russia’s Kursk Equipment Shift:  Tanks to Trucks, a Boon for Ukraine – Forbes

Facing catastrophic losses in military equipment, Russian troops in the Kursk region are transitioning from heavy armor to new trucks fresh off the assembly line. This unexpected shift presents new opportunities for the Ukrainian Armed Forces, according to military analysts.

While exact figures may be debated, the sheer scale of losses suffered by Russian forces in the region is undeniable. From August 6th to November 26th, they reportedly lost over 364 pieces of heavy equipment, primarily tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, and trucks. This wave of losses could be the “warm-up”

before an even larger replacement operation, as Russia attempts to replenish hundreds of destroyed vehicles in the region. Intelligence reports suggest that the cutting edge of this replacement effort involves a significant reduction in tracked vehicles and a corresponding increase in wheeled ones.

“This could mean fewer tanks, BMPs and BMD combat vehicles, as well as MT-LB armored tractors, being replaced by which are less armored and much lighter. We’re already seeing an increase in wheeled combat vehicles like the BTR-82 arriving at the front lines,” one analyst observes.

The drastic shift comes as a direct outcome of logistical pressures. Stocks of older vehicles are dwindling, and foreign sanctions cripple new production.

Russian factories have adapted by streamlining the manufacturing process, focusing on simpler, more readily deployable wheeled vehicles.

While officials warn the Ukrainian Armed Forces should brace for a steady flow of new Russian vehicles, there are positive consequences to this tactical change.

“New Russian vehicles are simply less powerful than those they are replacing. For example, the Tiger truck weighs only eight tons – half as much as the old BMP-2,” the analyst explains. “This weight difference reflects the fact that the Tiger has one-third less armor. Another significant disadvantage is that tracked vehicles like the BMP-2 are far more capable in mud, slush, and snow than any truck will be. Trucks will be forced to stick to major roads, making their movements more predictable for Ukrainian drone operators and artillery.”

Frontline Battles Continue in Kursk Region

Reports from the region suggest that Russian Infantry have captured villages, including Darino and Plekhovo.

“Every piece of land is fiercely contested,” states the commander of the 24th Assault Battalion, Aidar Stanislav Bunyatov. “The enemy is throwing everything they’ve got at us, utilizing their experience and resources to the fullest.”

* What are the reported scale of Russian ⁣heavy equipment losses in⁣ the Kursk region between August ​6th and‌ November 26th?

## Russian Army Facing New Equipment ⁤Challenges in Kursk: A Conversation

**Host:** Welcome back to the show. ⁣Today, we’re ⁢discussing a troubling trend ​for the Russian military in the Kursk region. Joining me to unpack ⁢this is military analyst Dr. Anya Petrova. Welcome, Dr. Petrova.

**Dr. Petrova:** Thank you for having me.

**Host:** Dr. Petrova, reports indicate that Russian⁢ forces in Kursk have ⁤suffered heavy equipment losses. Can you elaborate on the ‌scale of these losses?

**Dr. Petrova:** Absolutely. From August 6th to ‍November ⁣26th alone, Russian forces reportedly lost over 364 pieces‍ of heavy equipment. ‍Think tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, ⁢and trucks – the‌ backbone of​ their offensive capabilities. [[1](https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/08/17/out-in-the-open-and-on-the-move-in-russias-kursk-oblast-ukrainian-forces-are-vulnerable-and-losing-lots-of-armored-vehicles/)]This is a significant blow, even if ⁤exact figures are debatable.

**Host:** These losses are substantial. ⁢How ⁣is⁤ the Russian army responding?

**Dr. Petrova:** Interestingly, they seem to be shifting focus. Intelligence reports indicate that ‌they are transitioning from traditional heavy armor to newer, less armored ‍trucks fresh off ​the assembly line.

**Host:** Does ​this seem like a viable strategy?

**Dr. Petrova:** It’s certainly an unexpected move. While it might offer logistical advantages in terms of production ‍and deployment speed, it comes with significant drawbacks for the Russian ⁢army.

**Host:** Such⁤ as?

**Dr. Petrova:** Primarily, these new trucks offer far less protection for troops than their heavier counterparts. This could make them ‍more vulnerable to Ukrainian attacks, particularly given the advancements in Ukrainian anti-tank weaponry. ⁢ [[1](https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/08/17/out-in-the-open-and-on-the-move-in-russias-kursk-oblast-ukrainian-forces-are-vulnerable-and-losing-lots-of-armored-vehicles/)]

**Host:** So, potentially a strategic miscalculation on the ⁢part of the Russian military?

**Dr. ⁣Petrova:** It’s certainly a situation that opens up new opportunities ‍for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Their ​ability ⁤to capitalize on this shift⁢ in Russian tactics will‍ likely play a crucial role in the ongoing defense of the region.

**Host:** Thank you ‌for those insights, Dr. Petrova. This is certainly a situation ⁣we’ll be monitoring closely.

**Dr. Petrova:** My pleasure.

Leave a Replay