The Anti-Terrorism Court of Lahore gave a reserved verdict on the bail applications of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder chairman Imran Khan in 8 cases on May 9.
The anti-terrorism court in Lahore rejected the bails of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder in the Jinnah House attack and May 9 eight cases. Judge Manzar Ali Gul gave a reserved verdict on the bails.
Anti-Terrorism Court Judge Manzar Ali Gul heard former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s bail pleas in 8 cases on May 9. Founding Chairman PTI’s lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar appeared in the court.
Founder PTI filed bails in Jinnah House attack, Shadman police station arson cases and in Rahat Bakery Chowk and Zaman Park burning of police vehicles. Apart from this, the founding PTI also filed bails in the Askari Tower attack and three other May 9 cases, which were rejected by the court.
Report of the hearing
Barrister Salman Safdar while arguing in the court said that the wrong reaction to the opinion of PTI founder came from the people. I have represented founder PTI in more than 240 cases. All kinds of cases were registered against one accused. There is no section under which a case has not been registered. Cypher’s case went to the Supreme Court, all others got relief from subordinate courts.
The lawyer said that in 30 cases decisions have been made against the government. I am placing before you about 25 decisions. The plaintiffs in each case are policemen. The government has thrown googly, leg break, off break second third. Sometimes they say that the conspiracy took place in this way, then they say that it did not take place in this way. Bushra Bibi was included in 12 cases that she was also involved in the conspiracy. It is easy to accuse and difficult to prove.
Barrister Salman Safdar said that I am not asking you for discharge or dismissal of the case. You cannot even provide these facilities. The accused has been in prison for a long time, I am asking the court for bail.
The lawyer argued that Pervez Musharraf’s medical records were presented, he had to leave the world to prove them true. After that everyone was convinced that all the medicals were correct. Judges have relayed PTI founder’s detention in NAB custody from May 9 to 12.
Later, Special Prosecutor Rao Abdul Jabbar said in his arguments that all the cases are of rebellion against the government and attack on sensitive installations. The judgments presented are not related to these cases. According to British law, the King is not impeachable. The accused is not a king. At the behest of the accused, 200 installations were attacked. It was said on social media that today is the day of real jihad. Indian TV channels also continued to run the same news.
The prosecutor added in the arguments that the general public is prohibited from visiting certain places in Kent. Everyone has a modern device that communicates location and messages. How PC Hotel, Awari Hotel or milk shop in Anarkali was not attacked. Military installations were attacked. The statue of Colonel Sher Khan Shaheed, who sacrificed his life for the safety of the country, was kicked. These wars and attacks continue even today. The ranger and the policeman were martyred, while the accused says that I am in jail.
While giving arguments in the court on behalf of the prosecution, it was further said that the accused was not in jail on May 7 when the conspiracy took place, the application of the accused should be dismissed.
Later, the court reserved its judgment after completing the arguments on the bail pleas of the prosecution and the accused’s counsel.
#Major #verdict #Imran #Khans #bail #pleas #cases #Pakistan
What legal arguments were presented by Imran Khan’s lawyer to support his bail application?
## Imran Khan’s Bail Denied: A Legal Battle Continues
**Host:** Welcome back to the show. We’re going to delve into the latest developments surrounding former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan. Joining us today is legal expert, [Name of Guest], to provide insights into the recent court proceedings. Imran Khan’s bail applications in eight cases connected to the May 9th events have been rejected by the Anti-Terrorism Court in Lahore. Can you shed some light on this decision?
**Guest:**Certainly. This verdict is significant as it underscores the serious legal challenges Imran Khan is facing. The court, after careful consideration, rejected his bail plea in cases related to the Jinnah House attack, the arson at Shadman police station, and incidents of vandalizing police vehicles in several locations, including Zaman Park and Rahat Bakery Chowk. Additionally, bailapplications for cases concerning the attack on Askari Tower and three other May 9th incidents were also denied.
**Host:** Imran Khan’s lawyer argued vehemently for his client’s release. What were the key points of his defense?
**Guest:** Barrister Salman Safdar presented a robust defense, emphasizing that the public’s reaction stemmed from strong opinions about Imran Khan’s politics rather than orchestrated conspiracies. He highlighted the sheer number of cases filed against his client, emphasizing that accusations range across various legal spheres. He also pointed to previous instances where Imran Khan received relief from subordinate courts and argued that the extended period of imprisonment was unjust.
**Host:** Despite these arguments, the court ultimately sided with the prosecution. What might be the next legal steps for Imran Khan and his team?
**Guest:** This isn’t the end of the legal battle. Imran Khan’s team will likely appeal this decision in higher courts, challenging the reasoning behind the bail denial and seeking a review of the evidence presented. This case is far from over, and we can expect further legal maneuverings in the coming weeks and months.
**Host:** This ongoing legal battle has been closely watched by both supporters and detractors of Imran Khan. What are the broader implications of this verdict?
**Guest:** The decision reflects the continued political tensions in Pakistan. It’s a reminder of the fragility of the political landscape and the high stakes involved in holding powerful figures accountable. It remains to be seen how this case will ultimately unfold and what impact it will have on Pakistan’s political future.
