The Anti-Terrorism Court of Lahore gave a reserved verdict on the bail applications of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder chairman Imran Khan in 8 cases on May 9.
The anti-terrorism court in Lahore rejected the bails of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder in the Jinnah House attack and May 9 eight cases. Judge Manzar Ali Gul gave a reserved verdict on the bails.
Anti-Terrorism Court Judge Manzar Ali Gul heard former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s bail pleas in 8 cases on May 9. Founding Chairman PTI’s lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar appeared in the court.
Founder PTI filed bails in Jinnah House attack, Shadman police station arson cases and in Rahat Bakery Chowk and Zaman Park burning of police vehicles. Apart from this, founder PTI also filed bails in the Askari Tower attack and three other May 9 cases, which were rejected by the court.
Report of the hearing
Barrister Salman Safdar while arguing in the court said that the wrong reaction to the opinion of PTI founder came from the people. I have represented founder PTI in more than 240 cases. All kinds of cases were registered against one accused. There is no section under which a case has not been registered. Cypher’s case went to the Supreme Court, all others got relief from subordinate courts.
The lawyer said that in 30 cases decisions have been made against the government. I am placing before you about 25 decisions. The plaintiffs in each case are policemen. The government has thrown googly, leg break, off break second third. Sometimes they say that the conspiracy took place in this way, then they say that it did not take place in this way. Bushra Bibi was included in 12 cases that she was also involved in the conspiracy. It is easy to accuse and difficult to prove.
Barrister Salman Safdar said that I am not asking you for discharge or dismissal of the case. You cannot even provide these facilities. The accused has been in jail for a long time, I am asking the court for bail.
The lawyer argued that Pervez Musharraf’s medical records were presented, he had to leave the world to prove them true. After that everyone was convinced that all the medicals were correct. Judges have relayed PTI founder’s detention in NAB custody from May 9 to 12.
Later, Special Prosecutor Rao Abdul Jabbar said in his arguments that all the cases are of rebellion against the government and attack on sensitive installations. The judgments presented are not related to these cases. According to British law, the King is not impeachable. The accused is not a king. At the behest of the accused, 200 installations were attacked. It was said on social media that today is the day of real jihad. Indian TV channels also continued to run the same news.
The prosecutor added in the arguments that the general public is prohibited from visiting certain places in Kent. Everyone has a modern device that communicates location and messages. How PC Hotel, Awari Hotel or milk shop in Anarkali was not attacked. Military installations were attacked. The statue of Colonel Sher Khan Shaheed, who sacrificed his life to protect the country, was kicked. These wars and attacks continue even today. The ranger and the policeman were martyred, while the accused says that I am in jail.
While giving arguments in the court on behalf of the prosecution, it was further said that the accused was not in jail on May 7 when the conspiracy took place, the application of the accused should be dismissed.
Later, the court reserved its judgment after completing the arguments on the bail pleas of the prosecution and the accused’s counsel.
#Major #verdict #Imran #Khans #bail #pleas #cases #Pakistan
What are the potential consequences of the court’s decision for Imran Khan’s political career?
## Interview with Legal Expert on Imran Khan’s Bail Rejection
**Host:** Joining us today is legal expert [Guest name], who has been closely following the ongoing legal battles of former Prime Minister Imran Khan. [Guest name], thank you for being here.
**Guest:** Thank you for having me.
**Host:** As we know, an anti-terrorism court in Lahore has rejected Imran Khan’s bail applications in eight cases related to the May 9th protests. Can you give our viewers a summary of the situation?
**Guest:**Certainly. On May 9th, violent protests erupted across Pakistan following Imran Khan’s arrest. He was facing corruption charges at the time. These protests led to attacks on military installations, including the Jinnah House. Khan was subsequently arrested and charged under anti-terrorism laws.
**Host:** Khan’s lawyer, Barrister Salman Safdar, argued that the protests were a “wrong reaction” to Khan’s opinion and that the government has filed numerous cases against him. What is your take on these arguments?
**Guest:** Barrister Safdar is known for his aggressive legal defense. He is highlighting the sheer volume of cases against Khan, attempting to portray him as a victim of political persecution. He is also pointing out inconsistencies in the government’s narrative surrounding the May 9th events. However, the court ultimately deemed the evidence sufficient to deny Khan bail in these specific cases.
**Host:** What are the potential implications of this decision for Imran Khan and his political future?
**Guest:** This is a significant setback for Khan. Remaining in detention limits his ability to participate in politics and mobilize his supporters. The rejection of bail also suggests the seriousness with which the courts are treating these charges. It’s crucial to remember that these are ongoing legal proceedings, and the final outcome remains to be seen.
**Host:** Thank you for providing your insights on this complex situation, [Guest Name].
**Guest:** My pleasure.
