ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
How do Trump’s denials of Kamala Harris’s accusations reflect his overall strategy in addressing criticisms from political opponents?
**Interview with Political Analyst on Trump’s Response to Harris’ Remarks**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today. Following Kamala Harris’s comments about Donald Trump’s admiration for historical figures like Hitler, Trump has firmly denied being a Nazi, stating, “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi.” How do you interpret this response in the broader context of the current political climate?
**Analyst:** Thank you for having me. Trump’s response reflects a significant strategy he has used throughout his political career: to reject any labels that could damage his image and appeal to his base. By claiming he is “the opposite of a Nazi,” he is attempting to cast himself in a positive light, distancing himself from any accusations of authoritarianism or fascism, especially as the election approaches.
**Interviewer:** Harris labeled Trump as “even more unstable and more unhinged,” suggesting that he is seeking power without accountability. How do you think this characterization affects public perception as we near the elections?
**Analyst:** Kamala Harris’s comments are part of a broader narrative where Democrats are trying to frame Trump as a serious threat to democracy. This type of rhetoric aims to mobilize voters, particularly those who may be undecided. However, how effective this will be largely depends on public reception and the overall political sentiment in the country. There are many voters who view these attacks as typical political mudslinging, which could diminish their impact.
**Interviewer:** Trump also mentioned that this election cycle is different from those of 2016 or 2020, emphasizing that “there is a lot at stake.” What might he mean by this, and how could it resonate with voters?
**Analyst:** By asserting that ”there is a lot at stake,” Trump is likely tapping into the heightened emotions and stakes perceived around issues like the economy, immigration, and social justice. It serves to rally his supporters by suggesting that a loss in this election could lead to significant changes that not only affect them but the country as a whole. This urgency might resonate with voters who feel passionately about these issues.
**Interviewer:** Lastly, what should we watch for in the coming days as the election approaches?
**Analyst:** Pay attention to the tone and content of speeches from both candidates. As the race tightens, we might see more aggressive attacks. Additionally, watch for how voters respond to these narratives in polls and at the ballot box. Social media will also be a crucial battleground, where both campaigns will try to sway public opinion as we get closer to November.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights; this analysis will certainly help inform our understanding of the unfolding election landscape.
