ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
In what ways could Harris’s characterization of Trump as a danger to democracy influence voter perceptions and behavior in the upcoming elections?
**Interview with Political Analyst: Understanding the Recent Exchange Between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris**
**Interviewer**: Thank you for joining us today. Let’s start with the recent statements made by former President Donald Trump in response to Kamala Harris’s claims regarding his political stance. What are your thoughts on Trump’s declaration, “I am not a Nazi”?
**Analyst**: Thank you for having me. Trump’s insistence that he is “the opposite of a Nazi” is significant, especially given the context of the accusations against him. He is attempting to distance himself from extreme ideologies as he faces increasing scrutiny just days before the elections. This rhetoric plays into his strategy to secure his base by portraying himself as a victim of political attacks.
**Interviewer**: Kamala Harris referred to Trump as a danger and linked him to fascism. How important are such allegations in the context of election campaigning?
**Analyst**: Such allegations are pivotal in today’s political landscape. They highlight the tension and urgency in this election cycle. Harris’s comments suggest that she sees the potential for an authoritarian shift should Trump regain power. Both candidates are trying to frame the narrative to resonate with voters; for Democrats, this means underscoring concerns about democracy and governance.
**Interviewer**: Trump mentioned that this election is different from those in 2016 and 2020, citing “a lot at stake.” What do you think he meant by this?
**Analyst**: Trump is likely referring to the heightened polarization and the pressure surrounding key issues like democracy, economic stability, and social justice. The stakes feel higher for many voters, especially after the events surrounding the previous election and the January 6 Capitol riots. There is a palpable tension as voters weigh the implications of their choices.
**Interviewer**: With Trump’s assertion that there would be “no one there to stop it” if he were to win, how does this reflect the current political climate?
**Analyst**: That statement speaks to the present sentiments of lack of faith in institutions like the Supreme Court. Many Americans are worried about the system’s checks and balances and whether they can effectively hold leaders accountable. Trump’s comments may resonate with those feeling disenfranchised by the political system and highlight a broader concern about governance and accountability.
**Interviewer**: Lastly, how do you see this interaction impacting voters in the upcoming elections?
**Analyst**: This interaction could energize both Trump’s supporters and his opponents. His base might rally around him, seeing him as fighting against unfounded attacks, while those on the Democratic side are likely to use Harris’s statements to mobilize voters against what they perceive as a rising threat to democracy. Ultimately, it underscores how deeply divided the electorate is and how critical this election will be for both parties.
**Interviewer**: Thank you for your insights. It’s clear that we are witnessing a charged electoral atmosphere.
**Analyst**: Absolutely. It’s going to be a fascinating and intense few days leading up to the election. Thank you for having me.