FOOTBALL ZONENov 27, 2024, 1:52 PM
Last updated: Nov 27, 2024, 2:02 pm
The first analysis by René van der Gijp and Johan Derksen about Manchester City – Feyenoord did not turn out well. Gibe said after the advertisement that the people of Rotterdam ‘have no say at all’. Manchester City was still ahead 3-0 at that time. “It’s not RKC, is it?”, said Derksen Today Inside.
Feyenoord played compactly and gave away few chances in the first half. Shortly before halftime, referee Radu Petrescu pointed to the spot due to an alleged foul by Quinten Timber on Erling Haaland. That decision seemed a bit harshly punished, but the video referee did not intervene. This allowed the Norwegian goal machine to stand behind the ball and score the opening goal.
Na rust given the Citizens gas and it was inside no-time 3-0. After the advertisement, Van der Gijp and Derksen were not impressed by the game of the Rotterdam team. “Like Feyenoord, that you have nothing to say at all… That’s a shame,” he says Gibe.
“Then you sit in the dressing room afterwards and you haven’t done anything. Sad. It’s also good for players that they once notice: ‘This level is a bit higher.’” Derksen: “It’s not RKC, is it?” Van der Gijp agrees. “No, no. And it is not sc Heerenveen either.”
Feyenoord seemed to go home empty-handed after the 3-0 deficit, but thanks to goals from Anis Hadj Moussa, Santiago Gimenez and Dávid Hancko, the Rotterdam team still grabbed a point: 3-3. “This was crazy. The first half went as we expected. After the break, two quick goals were scored, which was not easy, but at the end we got the reward,” said Hancko afterwards in conversation with ESPN.
Priske started using a different playing style after the third goal. “We tried something different. It may not have been our usual game plan, but we tried, showed character and it resulted in a draw. I am proud of everyone,” the defender continued.
“It’s special to score. As a youngster you look at these clubs and now I have scored here. That’s something I never expected. I will never forget this moment.”
Right, so Feyenoord went to Manchester City, got absolutely, utterly spanked… at least for 60 minutes. 3-nil down? Against Haaland’s goal-scoring machine? That’s not exactly “having a say,” is it? Sounds more like whispering “please, sir, can I have some more?” to a badger with a chainsaw.
Rene van der Gijp, bless his grumpy heart, summed it up nicely, though I suspect with a face like a smacked arse. “Like Feyenoord, that you have nothing to say at all… that’s a shame.”
You’d think being down 3-0 against City would give you a bit of a dig in the nuts, a wake-up call shouting, “Oi, lads, this isn’t Sunday League!”
And Derksen? Predictably, he chimes in with “It’s not RKC, is it?” He meant it in the “oh you poor, quaint little thing” kind of way, not the actual scary way, of course. RKC are Wednesday night bingo, City are a titan-volcano eruption of football.
But then, wouldn’t you know it? Feyenoord had a bit of a “hold my beer” moment. Hancko, Hadj Moussa, Gimenez… these lads pulled out a miracle three-goal comeback like it was a bloody magician’s rabbit out of a hat.
And Hancko? Oh, he’s having a “special” moment is he? Scoring against City? Look, I’m impressed. Finance Minister is probably looking into why football clubs are suddenly so economically viable.
So, what does it all mean?
Well, it means Feyenoord’s got balls. It means City can relax a bit, but not too much, because these Dutch lot can bite back.
And it means this wasn’t just football. This was a bloody Shakespearean drama, folks! Drama, tragedy, comedy, and a Mickey Mouse ending. You couldn’t write this stuff.
Oh, and to answer the unspoken question: yes, I did wonder if Derksen was secretly rooting for Feyenoord the whole time. Just a touch.
He probably wouldn’t admit it though. He’d more likely blame it on the ref, the ball, the stadium atmosphere, maybe even the octopus salad he had for lunch. But deep down, a little bit of him, maybe, just maybe, was cheering along with the Rotterdam faithful.
Right, that’s enough from me. Time for a lie down. This whole “football” thing is exhausting.
FOOTBALL ZONENov 27, 2024, 1:52 PM
Last updated: Nov 27, 2024, 2:02 pm
The first analysis by René van der Gijp and Johan Derksen about Manchester City’s match against Feyenoord did not go well for the Rotterdam team. Gibe said after the advertisement that Feyenoord ‘have no say at all’ in the match, with Manchester City leading 3-0 at that point. “It’s not RKC, is it?”, Derksen quipped on Today Inside.
Despite playing a compact first half and limiting Manchester City’s chances, Feyenoord conceded a penalty just before halftime. Referee Radu Petrescu awarded the spot-kick for an alleged foul by Quinten Timber on Erling Haaland, a decision that seemed harsh but was not overturned by the video assistant referee. This allowed Haaland to step up and score the opening goal, putting Manchester City ahead.
After halftime, Manchester City turned up the pressure and quickly scored two more goals, extending their lead to 3-0. After the advertisement break, Van der Gijp and Derksen were unimpressed by Feyenoord’s performance.
“Seeing Feyenoord like this, they genuinely have nothing to say at all… that’s a shame,” said Gibe. “ Then you sit in the dressing room afterward and you haven’t done anything. It’s sad. It’s also beneficial for the players to realize: ‘This level is a bit higher.’” Derksen added, “It’s not RKC, is it?” Van der Gijp agreed. “No, no. And it is not sc Heerenveen either.”
Facing a 3-0 deficit, Feyenoord seemed destined to leave Manchester empty-handed. However, a remarkable turnaround saw them score three goals in quick succession through Anis Hadj Moussa, Santiago Gimenez, and Dávid Hancko, snatching a stunning 3-3 draw.
“This was crazy. The first half unfolded as we anticipated. After the break, two rapid goals were scored, which wasn’t easy, but in the end, we earned our reward,” Hancko told ESPN after the match.
Fyeenoord manager Arne Slot revealed they switched tactics after conceding the third goal.
“We tried something different. It might not have been our typical game plan, but we tried, demonstrated character, and it resulted in a draw. I am proud of everyone,” the defender continued.
“Scoring a goal here is special. As a young player, you look at these clubs, dreaming of playing against them. Now I’ve scored here. That’s something I never expected. I will never forget this moment.”
What tactical adjustments did Feyenoord make in the second half that led to their comeback against Manchester City?
## Interview:
**Interviewer:** Joining us today is former Dutch footballer and analyst, [Guest Name], to discuss Feyenoord’s unexpected draw against Manchester City. [Guest Name], what were your thoughts watching Feyenoord initially struggle against a dominant City side?
**Guest:** Well, I think it’s fair to say that the first 60 minutes were a bit of a gut punch for Feyenoord fans. Being 3-0 down against Haaland and City, it looked bleak.
Rene van der Gijp’s comment about Feyenoord having “no say at all” [[1](https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/live/c5yr4wvgrwdt)]reflects the sentiment at that point. Even Johan Derksen’s quip about it ”not being RKC” [[1](https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/live/c5yr4wvgrwdt)], while humorous, underlined the vast gulf in quality.
**Interviewer:** But then Feyenoord seemingly came alive in the final 30 minutes, scoring three goals to snatch a point. What sparked this incredible comeback?
**Guest:** It was remarkable, wasn’t it? I think Priske’s tactical adjustments after the third goal played a role. They shifted to a more attacking style, showed immense character, and ultimately reaped the rewards.
Hancko’s comments after scoring, calling it a “special” moment, sums up the feeling perfectly. This wasn’t just a draw; it was a statement of Feyenoord’s resilience and fighting spirit.
**Interviewer:** This result must have sent shockwaves through the football world. What does this say about Feyenoord’s potential, and about Manchester City’s vulnerability?
**Guest:** I think it sends a clear message that Feyenoord can compete on the biggest stage, even against the best teams. They showed they have the heart, the spirit, and the talent to cause upsets.
As for City, while they remain a top side, this match reveals that they can be susceptible to defensive lapses and late surges from opponents.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights, [Guest Name]. It sounds like this was a truly unforgettable match!
