Brussels – In a decisive move reflecting solidarity amid ongoing geopolitical tensions, 26 of the European Council’s member states have signaled their unwavering support for Ukraine. The move, finalized during the summit, underscores the EU’s commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Hungary notably dissented, creating a split within the bloc on the issue.

According to a Council press release, the conclusions on Ukraine were “firmly supported by 26 heads of state or government. The European Council will return to the issue at the next meeting.” This statement highlights both the overwhelming support and the intention to revisit the matter, suggesting ongoing negotiations and potential refinements to the EU’s strategy.

The EU’s stance is rooted in what they describe as a “`peace approach through force,'” emphasizing that Ukraine needs to be in “the strongest possible position, with its solid military and defence skills as an essential component.” This strategy, while controversial, is intended to deter further Russian aggression and provide Ukraine with the means to defend itself.

For U.S. readers, this EU strategy can be compared to the historical concept of “peace through strength,” a doctrine frequently enough associated with the Reagan administration. Just as the U.S. built up its military during the cold War to deter Soviet aggression, the EU is now advocating for a similar approach to support Ukraine.

The EU’s approach extends beyond military support, encompassing a broader commitment to Ukraine’s independence and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders.

Recent developments suggest a multifaceted approach, including humanitarian aid and diplomatic efforts. The situation bears resemblance to past U.S. involvements in international conflicts, such as the Balkans in the 1990s, where a combination of military intervention, economic sanctions, and diplomatic negotiations eventually led to a cessation of hostilities.

The EU’s declaration emphasizes its ongoing engagement “in coordination with the partners and allies who think in the same way, to provide further global support for Ukraine and its people, in the exercise of his intrinsic right to the self -defense against the war of aggression of Russia.” this coordinated approach signals a unified front against Russian aggression, echoing the alliances formed during the Cold War to contain Soviet influence.

“Remembering its previous conclusions – reads the document – the European Council reiterates its continuous and unshakable support for independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders.”

U.S.-Ukraine joint Declaration Welcomed

EU leaders also expressed their approval of the recent joint declaration between Ukraine and the United States,following their meeting in Saudi Arabia on March 11,2025. The declaration reportedly includes proposals for a cease-fire agreement, humanitarian efforts, and the resumption of intelligence sharing and security assistance from the U.S.

The EU welcomes “with the joint declaration of Ukraine and the united States following their meeting in Saudi Arabia on 11 March 2025, including the proposals of an agreement of ceased fire, humanitarian efforts and the resumption of sharing intelligence services and security assistance by the United States.”

This mirrors the kind of diplomatic interventions the U.S. has historically undertaken in various global hotspots, from the Middle East to the Korean Peninsula. The involvement of Saudi Arabia as a mediator further adds a layer of complexity, reflecting the shifting alliances and geopolitical dynamics in the region. The U.S. has often played a similar role, leveraging its relationships with various countries to facilitate peace talks.

Call for Russian De-escalation

Amidst ongoing tensions, the European Council has directly appealed to Russia to demonstrate a genuine commitment to ending the war. “The European Council invites Russia to demonstrate a real political will to put an end to the war,” the statement reads.

This call for de-escalation is reminiscent of the diplomatic pressure exerted on the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Whether Russia will heed this call remains to be seen,but the EU’s unified stance sends a strong signal about the international community’s expectations.

Hungary’s Dissent: Implications and counterarguments

Hungary’s decision to break ranks with the other 26 member states raises questions about the EU’s unity and its ability to present a cohesive front against external threats. Critics argue that Hungary’s stance weakens the EU’s position and emboldens Russia. However, some analysts suggest that Hungary’s dissent may be a strategic move to secure specific concessions or to maintain a degree of neutrality in the conflict.

Counterarguments to the EU’s approach frequently enough cite the potential for escalating the conflict and the risk of further destabilizing the region. Some argue that providing military aid to Ukraine could prolong the war and increase the suffering of the Ukrainian people. However, proponents of the EU’s strategy maintain that inaction would only embolden Russia and undermine the principles of international law and sovereignty.