Voting for second and fourth place on the Storting list for the Oslo Labor Party was due when the county team gathered for a nomination meeting in the traditional Samfunnssalen in Oslo on Tuesday evening. The members of the nomination committee have not agreed among themselves on who should have the safe second place, as well as the fourth place on the list.
– We have not succeeded, admitted election committee leader Rina Mariann Hansen after explaining the considerable efforts the committee has made through many and long meetings to arrive at a unanimous recommendation for the Storting list.
The majority of the committee nominates Hadia Tajik for the safe second place on the nomination list. The minority wants Kamzy Gunaratnam. If Ap’s support remains at its current level at the election next year, the party is likely to get only three representatives from Oslo in the Storting.
– We have a small group of politicians in Norway who can face Sylvi Listhaug and Erna Solberg in a debate and come out victorious. Hadia is one of them, said Hansen.
– On the whistleblower’s side
Hansen also pointed out that “there were few who stood as straight-backed” on the side of whistleblowers as Hadia Tajik when the metoo dispute ravaged the party. The then deputy leader of the Labor Party, Trond Giske, resigned in 2018 after several women reported him.
The party leadership concluded that Giske had broken the party’s guidelines against sexual harassment. Giske has contested this and also several of the notifications, but has also apologized for his behaviour.
Gunaratnam has the second place on today’s list and is nominated for the same place by the minority – consisting of one of nine members – on the committee.
– Who will take the fight for Oslo? The Oslo list is traditionally characterized by national politicians. Kamzy grew up in Groruddalen, is a popular Oslo politician, former deputy mayor and leader of Oslo AUF, said Laial Janet Ayoub.
Party leader Jonas Gahr Støre is, by all indications, beaten into first place, and so is deputy leader Jan Christian Vestre in third place.
Completely even
Until recently, there was a dead heat between Tajik and Gunaratnam, according to him VG. Each of them received support from 105 delegates, the count the newspaper had carried out showed.
Gunaratnam is said to have led quite clearly earlier this autumn, with the support of more than twice as many delegates as Tajik. But Tajik is said to have taken the lead in recent weeks, the newspaper wrote.
As it is competitive voting, voting must be done in writing. It will make it easier for the delegates to break with their local team and vote according to their own convictions. The counting and mapping of how the local teams are positioned is therefore fraught with uncertainty.
If there is a deadlock, there will be a new written vote. If it also ends in a tie, the nomination will be decided by drawing lots, the rules of procedure state.
National versus local
Tajik’s supporters have highlighted the difficult position she has had in the Labor Party as both deputy leader and minister and the implementation power she has to show time.
Gunaratnam’s supporters have been skeptical that there is a lack of local political voice if only candidates who are widely perceived as national politicians are elected. Some also have opposite The daily newspaper expressed skepticism that Tajik is “shopping counties” after she reported moving from Rogaland to Oslo.
In addition to the battle for second place, there are also two battles for fourth place.
Here, Agnes Nærland Viljugrein has the support of a majority in the nomination committee, while the minority wanted Trine Lise Sundnes.
Frode Jacobsen is set for fifth place on the list.
#Ready #battle #parliamentary #seats #Oslo #Labor #Party
What are the potential implications for the Oslo Labor Party if the division regarding the Storting list nominees intensifies? [[1](https://www.stortinget.no/en/In-English/Members-of-the-Storting/Parliamentary-Party-Groups/the-labor-party/)]
Interviewer: Welcome to the show. Today we’re discussing the upcoming election and the competitive nomination process for the Storting list within the Oslo Labor Party. Joining us is Alex Reed, a political analyst who can shed some light on this situation.
Alex Reed, thank you for being here.
Alex Reed: Thanks for having me.
Interviewer: Let’s dive right in. There seems to be quite a division within the Oslo Labor Party regarding who should occupy the second and fourth positions on the Storting list. Can you explain the situation?
Alex Reed: That’s right. The nomination committee hasn’t been able to reach a unanimous decision, which is unusual. Hadia Tajik, a former deputy leader of the party, is favored by the majority for the second spot. While Kamzy Gunaratnam, a popular local politician, is supported by a minority faction.
Interviewer: These are both strong candidates with distinct profiles. What are the arguments being made for and against each candidate?
Alex Reed: Hansen, the election committee leader, highlighted Tajik as one of the few politicians who can effectively debate against political heavyweights like Sylvi Listhaug and Erna Solberg. She also praises Tajik’s strong stance in supporting whistleblowers during the “metoo” dispute within the party. On the other hand, Gunaratnam’s supporters emphasize her strong connection to Oslo, her experience as deputy mayor, and her leadership of Oslo AUF.
Interviewer: It sounds like the decision is challenging. What are the implications of this division for the Oslo Labor Party?
Alex Reed: This indecision could potentially create rifts within the party, especially if the competition becomes overly heated. It also highlights the difficulty of balancing national appeal with local representation on the Storting list.
Interviewer: Lastly, what do you think the outcome of this nomination process will be?
Alex Reed: It’s difficult to say for sure. The split seems fairly even, with both Tajik and Gunaratnam having strong arguments in their favor. It will ultimately come down to how the remaining committee members weigh the different factors at play.
Interviewer: This is certainly a fascinating development to watch. Thank you for your insights, Alex Reed.
