Voting for second and fourth place on the Storting list for the Oslo Labor Party was due when the county team gathered for a nomination meeting in the traditional Samfunnssalen in Oslo on Tuesday evening. The members of the nomination committee have not agreed among themselves on who should have the safe second place, as well as the fourth place on the list.
– We have not succeeded, admitted election committee leader Rina Mariann Hansen after explaining the considerable efforts the committee has made through many and long meetings to arrive at a unanimous recommendation for the Storting list.
The majority of the committee nominates Hadia Tajik for the safe second place on the nomination list. The minority wants Kamzy Gunaratnam. If Ap’s support remains at its current level at the election next year, the party is likely to get only three representatives from Oslo in the Storting.
– We have a small group of politicians in Norway who can face Sylvi Listhaug and Erna Solberg in a debate and come out victorious. Hadia is one of them, said Hansen.
– On the whistleblower’s side
Hansen also pointed out that “there were few who stood as straight-backed” on the side of whistleblowers as Hadia Tajik when the metoo dispute ravaged the party. The then deputy leader of the Labor Party, Trond Giske, resigned in 2018 after several women reported him.
The party leadership concluded that Giske had broken the party’s guidelines against sexual harassment. Giske has contested this and also several of the notifications, but has also apologized for his behaviour.
Gunaratnam has the second place on today’s list and is nominated for the same place by the minority – consisting of one of nine members – on the committee.
– Who will take the fight for Oslo? The Oslo list is traditionally characterized by national politicians. Kamzy grew up in Groruddalen, is a popular Oslo politician, former deputy mayor and leader of Oslo AUF, said Laial Janet Ayoub.
Party leader Jonas Gahr Støre is, by all accounts, beaten into first place, and so is deputy leader Jan Christian Vestre in third place.
Completely even
Until recently, there was a dead heat between Tajik and Gunaratnam, according to him VG. Each of them received support from 105 delegates, the count the newspaper had carried out showed.
Gunaratnam is said to have led quite clearly earlier this autumn, with the support of more than twice as many delegates as Tajik. But Tajik is said to have taken the lead in recent weeks, the newspaper wrote.
As it is competitive voting, voting must be done in writing. It will make it easier for the delegates to break with their local team and vote according to their own convictions. The counting and mapping of how the local teams are positioned is therefore fraught with uncertainty.
If there is a deadlock, there will be a new written vote. If it also ends in a tie, the nomination will be decided by drawing lots, the rules of procedure state.
National versus local
Tajik’s supporters have highlighted the difficult position she has had in the Labor Party as both deputy leader and minister and the implementation power she has to show time.
Gunaratnam’s supporters have been skeptical that there is a lack of local political voice if only candidates who are widely perceived as national politicians are elected. Some also have opposite The daily newspaper expressed skepticism that Tajik is “shopping counties” after she reported moving from Rogaland to Oslo.
In addition to the battle for second place, there are also two battles for fourth place.
Here, Agnes Nærland Viljugrein has the support of a majority in the nomination committee, while the minority wanted Trine Lise Sundnes.
Frode Jacobsen is set for fifth place on the list.
#Ready #battle #parliamentary #seats #Oslo #Labor #Party
How might differing viewpoints on the balance between national and local representation within the Oslo Labor Party influence the outcome of the nomination process?
## Oslo Labor Party Nomination for Storting Faces Tough Choices
**(INTRO MUSIC)**
**HOST:** Welcome back to the show. Joining us today is political analyst, [GUEST NAME], to discuss the intense inner-party debate within the Oslo branch of Norway’s Labor Party. There’s a fierce competition brewing over second and fourth place on the Storting list for next year’s election. [GUEST NAME], what’s causing this deadlock?
**GUEST:** Absolutely, [HOST NAME]. It seems the Oslo Labor Party is facing a bit of a dilemma. While party leader Jonas Gahr Støre and deputy leader Jan Christian Vestre are secure in their first and third positions, the race for second and fourth places between Hadia Tajik and Kamzy Gunaratnam has resulted in a stalemate. The nomination committee, despite numerous discussions, cannot reach a unanimous decision.
**HOST:** Interesting. Can you shed some light on the reasons behind this divide?
**GUEST:** Certainly. The committee is split. A majority shines a spotlight on Tajik’s strong debating skills and her unwavering support for whistleblowers during the 2018 #MeToo controversy within the party. They see her as a formidable force against opponents like Sylvi Listhaug and Erna Solberg.
**HOST:** And what about Gunaratnam?
**GUEST:** Gunaratnam’s supporters, albeit a minority on the committee, believe her deep roots in Oslo, having grown up there and served as deputy mayor, make her a compelling candidate. They argue she embodies the local voice and can successfully champion Oslo’s interests.
**HOST:** This deadlock must reflect wider discussions within the party.
**GUEST:** Definitely. This highlights a key debate happening within the Oslo Labor Party: national versus local representation. The Oslo list often features prominent national politicians, while Gunaratnam’s supporters argue for a stronger focus on local figures.
**HOST:** And what about the potential impact on the party’s electoral performance in Oslo?
**GUEST:**
Following the information from the article, currently, the Oslo Labor Party is likely to secure three representatives based on their current support levels. However, the outcome of this nomination struggle could potentially influence the margins, and the party’s ability to maximize its representation in Oslo.
**(OUTRO MUSIC)**
**HOST:** We’re sure to see more developments in this exciting race. [GUEST NAME], thank you for offering your insights into this complex situation within the Oslo Labor Party.