“`html
Australian Climate Skeptics Eye U.S.for Inspiration, Funding Amidst Anti-Renewables Push
A network of climate change deniers in Australia, associated with the Saltbush Club, is looking to the United States for guidance and support as they actively campaign against renewable energy initiatives.
SYDNEY, Australia — A group of prominent climate change skeptics in Australia, known as the Saltbush Club, is strategically pivoting its focus from directly disputing climate science to challenging the feasibility and affordability of renewable energy. This shift comes as the group seeks to build a “national network” to influence energy policy and public opinion, drawing inspiration from similar movements in the United States.
The Saltbush Club: A Hub of Climate Skepticism
The Saltbush Club holds its regular meetings at a golf club in Five Dock, a suburb in Sydney’s inner west. Its founding members include influential figures such as Gina Rinehart, a mining magnate; Campbell Newman, the former Queensland premier; Hugh Morgan, former head of the Business Council of Australia; and Colin Boyce, a member of Parliament.
Rafe Champion, another Saltbush founder, explained the group’s strategic shift away from overt climate denial. “We resolved to temporarily pivot from the climate debate and launch the Energy realists of Australia to talk to people about matters that really concern them, like the price and security of power, instead of science,” Champion said. The aim,he wrote on his blog, is to target public sentiment using “evidence that they can understand, unlike the finer points of climate science.”
Anti-renewables Campaigns Gain Traction
While both major political parties in australia express support for net-zero emissions targets, anti-renewables campaigns have gained momentum in certain regions. Some candidates and campaigns opposing renewable energy initiatives have consulted with members of the Saltbush Club and others who deny the existence of a climate crisis.
In the New South Wales northern rivers seat of Richmond, for example, Nationals candidate Kimberly Hone discussed “cross-border team work on affordable and reliable energy” with Neil Killion, a Saltbush Club member and organizer of the Climate and Energy Realists of Queensland. Hone posted a photograph of their meeting on her Facebook page.Killion later spoke at a meeting about forming a “national network” encompassing climate change deniers, anti-renewables campaigners, and elements of the post-COVID freedom movement.
Echoes of U.S. Tactics and Ideologies
The Saltbush Club’s focus on the costs and reliability of renewable energy mirrors arguments frequently used by climate change skeptics and fossil fuel advocates in the united States. Groups like the Heartland Institute and the competitive Enterprise Institute have long argued that renewable energy is too expensive and unreliable to replace fossil fuels, and that policies aimed at reducing emissions will harm the economy.
The Australian network appears to be taking cues directly from the U.S. political landscape. Senator Matt Canavan told an energy forum that the 2020 election of Joe Biden had been key to the Coalition signing up to net zero emissions targets. “When we did sign up to net zero … [former prime minister] Scott Morrison told us we had to do that because Joe Biden was elected and he wanted to do it, which was strange to me because there were a lot of allegations of voting irregularities at that election … I can’t remember anyone saying that Australians voted,” Canavan said.
Canavan added, “It really perplexes me that, hang on, shouldn’t we get to decide on that? We haven’t had actually had an election to decide on whether we should support net zero. There hasn’t been a battle. We never asked. Both sides of politics signed up to it… It would be nice to have that political battle, I keep pushing for that.”
‘A Big Political Possibility’
At a meeting attended by Killion, Colin Boyce said blackouts were “a big political opportunity” and that he had urged fellow MPs to adopt a “do-nothing strategy” that would allow power outages and build opposition to net zero policies. Viv Forbes, the executive director of the Saltbush Club and a former coal mining executive, has publicly supported an international declaration claiming “there is no climate emergency” and that “CO2 is plant food.”
U.S. Influence and Funding
While direct financial links between U.S. and Australian climate change denial groups are sometimes difficult to trace, several U.S.-based foundations and think tanks have a long history of funding climate change skepticism and anti-renewables campaigns globally. Organizations like the Koch network, for example, have provided significant financial support to groups that actively challenge climate science and promote fossil fuels.
The Saltbush Club sees potential for a shift in Australia, inspired by developments in the U.S. “So far there is not much to show for our efforts but events are starting to move very quickly in the United States,” Champion wrote on his blog. “we expect this will help us after the forthcoming national election when climate and energy realists
Interview: Dr. Eleanor Vance on the Future of Energy and Climate Skepticism in Australia
Welcome too Archyde News. Today, we’re speaking with Dr. Eleanor Vance, a leading energy policy analyst. Dr. Vance, thank you for joining us.
The Shifting Landscape of Australian Climate Debate
Interviewer: Dr. Vance, the article highlights a strategic shift by groups like the Saltbush Club, moving away from direct climate science disputes towards questioning the cost and reliability of renewable energy. What’s yoru assessment of this approach?
Dr. Vance: It’s a calculated move, leveraging legitimate concerns about energy costs and reliability. By framing the debate around these issues, they can tap into anxieties and concerns that resonate more widely with the public, and gain influence.
US Influence on Australian Energy Policy
Interviewer: The article suggests the Saltbush Club is drawing inspiration, and possibly funding, from the U.S. What specific influences can you identify?
Dr. Vance: We’ve seen this playbook before: questioning renewable energy’s feasibility, discrediting climate science by focusing on economic impacts, and promoting fossil fuels as the only reliable source. Groups like the Heartland Institute have been especially influential and have demonstrated a proven track record of promoting skepticism,and of course,the backing of conservative donors is a significant factor.
Net-Zero Targets and the Political Divide
Interviewer: The article references Senator Canavan’s comments about the political landscape, seeing the 2020 U.S.election impacting net-zero targets. How is this playing out politically in Australia now?
Dr. Vance: The net-zero targets have bipartisan support on a federal level,but as the article shows,they’re increasingly opposed by small minority groups on the fringe. In some areas where candidates oppose renewables, it’s an prospect to gain influence at the community level. The political opportunity presented by advocating for increased energy reliability is undeniable for some.
the Role of the free market
Interviewer: A recurring theme from skeptics is around government overreach. How does the free market play into this narrative?
Dr. Vance: The narrative paints government regulation as stifling innovation and competition within the energy sector. The argument typically is that a free market would drive down costs and promote the most efficient energy solutions, which, the skeptics believe, means continuing with fossil fuels by default.
Looking Ahead: The Future of Renewable Energy in Australia
Interviewer: Lastly, what do you see as the future for renewable energy in Australia, given these opposing pressures?
dr. Vance: The trend is clear: renewables are becoming consistently more cost-competitive. Overcoming public perception of their reliability is key. To succeed, renewables need strong federal support and a cohesive message from the leaders while working toward a modern electric grid. The biggest battle is still to come.
interviewer: Dr. Vance, thank you for your insights.It’s a complex issue with many players,and the debate is far from over.
Dr. vance: Thank you for having me.
What are your thoughts on the influence of U.S. climate change skepticism on Australian energy policy? Share your insights in the comments below.