Delhi University Principal’s Cow Dung Classroom Coating Sparks Debate Over Sustainability and Employability
By News Journalist
A video showing Pratyush Vatsala, the principal of Laxmibai College at Delhi University, applying cow dung to the walls of a classroom has ignited a widespread discussion about traditional practices, environmental sustainability, and their place in modern education. The 35-second video, which quickly went viral, depicts vatsala standing on a wooden desk, meticulously coating the walls with cow dung.
Vatsala told PTI news agency that this unusual activity is part of an ongoing research project led by a faculty member.
The principal of Delhi University’s Laxmibai College has been caught on video smearing cow dung on the walls of a classroom.
When asked, Principal Pratyush Vatsala said that the purpose is to keep the classrooms cool in a natural way during summers.
#DelhiUniversity
#BabyGirl
pic.twitter.com/rpEKj0HLth
— Mr. Perfect (@Brave_092)
“It is indeed under process. I will be able to share details of the full research after a week. The research is being carried out in porta cabins. I coated one of them myself as there’s no harm in touching natural mud. Some people are spreading misinformation without knowing the full details,” the Principal stated to the agency, defending her actions and emphasizing the natural aspect of the practice.
The video shows the principal, dressed in a teal sari and wearing training shoes, using semi-circular motions to apply the cow dung. A man stands nearby, holding a pan filled with the dung.
Cooling Strategy or Questionable Practice?
According to sources, the principal shared the video within the college’s teacher’s group, explaining that the initiative aims to adopt indigenous methods for cooling classrooms in one of the college’s five blocks, specifically C Block.
“Those who have classes here will soon get these rooms in a new look. Efforts are being made to make your teaching experience pleasant,” the principal reportedly said in the message.
Concerns over Student Employability
The incident has sparked concerns beyond the immediate practicality of the cow dung application. Vijender Chauhan, an educator and motivational speaker, raised questions about the potential impact on the college’s graduates.
She is Principal of a college of my University. Duly plastering cow-shit on classroom walls. I am concerned about many things – to begin with- If you are an employer and applicant studied from an institution which has such academic leader- what are odds of her getting hired? pic.twitter.com/0olZutRudS
— Vijender Chauhan (@masijeevi)
“She is Principal of a college of my university. Duly plastering cow-shit on classroom walls. I am concerned about many things – to begin with- If you are an employer and applicant studied from an institution which has such academic leader- what are the odds of her getting hired?” Chauhan questioned,highlighting concerns about the college’s image and the employability of its students in a competitive job market,notably in U.S. contexts where unconventional practices might be viewed differently.
Ancient context and Scientific Perspectives
While the Laxmibai College incident is unique in an educational setting,the use of cow dung as a cooling agent has precedents. In 2023, a doctor in Madhya Pradesh plastered his car with cow dung, claiming it effectively lowered the vehicle’s interior temperature. Similarly,in 2019,a homemaker in Gujarat gained internet fame for coating her Toyota Altis with cow dung.
“It not only keeps my car cool but also helps in preventing pollution. The harmful gases that are released while we use car AC increase the temperatures and contribute to global warming. I drive my car switching off the AC as the cow-dung keeps it cool,” Ms. Shah told ANI news agency, emphasizing the environmental angle.
But while anecdotal evidence suggests cooling properties, scientific studies offer a more nuanced picture. While cow dung can act as an insulator, its effectiveness depends on various factors like thickness, climate, and application method. A thin layer might offer minimal insulation, while a thicker layer could perhaps provide some benefit, similar to how adobe structures regulate temperature in arid climates of the Southwest U.S. However, concerns about hygiene, odor, and the potential for attracting pests remain valid.
Alternative Cooling Methods and U.S. Comparisons
In the United States, a range of cooling solutions are employed, from energy-efficient HVAC systems to passive cooling techniques like strategic landscaping, reflective roofing, and the use of thermal mass in construction. The effectiveness of these methods is well-documented and supported by building science research.
For example, cool roofs, which reflect sunlight and absorb less heat than standard roofs, are widely used in states like California and Arizona to reduce urban heat island effects and lower energy consumption. Similarly, passive solar design, which optimizes building orientation and window placement to maximize natural heating and cooling, is gaining popularity in lasting building practices across the country.
Table: Comparison of Cooling Methods
Cooling Method | Effectiveness | Cost | Environmental Impact | U.S. Adoption |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cow Dung Coating | Potentially effective in specific climates; limited scientific evidence. | Low (primarily labor and material cost). | Potentially sustainable if sourced locally; concerns about hygiene and methane emissions. | Minimal; largely anecdotal. |
High-Efficiency HVAC | Highly effective and controllable. | High initial cost; ongoing energy expenses. | Significant energy consumption; potential for refrigerant leaks. | Widespread. |
Cool Roofs | Effective in reducing heat absorption. | Moderate initial cost. | Reduces energy consumption and urban heat island effect. | Increasingly popular, especially in warm climates. |
Passive solar Design | Effective when integrated into building design. | Variable depending on design complexity. | Low environmental impact; maximizes natural resources. | Growing adoption in sustainable building practices. |
Ethical Considerations and Academic Freedom
The incident also raises questions about academic freedom and ethical considerations in research. While universities encourage innovative research,there’s also a responsibility to ensure that studies are conducted responsibly and don’t negatively impact the institution’s reputation or the well-being of its students.
Administrators in U.S. universities often navigate similar situations when faculty pursue controversial or unconventional research. The key is to balance academic freedom with ethical guidelines, ensuring transparency, informed consent, and a thorough review process.
What specific performance indicators, benchmarks, adn safety checks were in place to determine if the cow dung submission proved effective, and what impact it had on the environmental conditions of the classrooms?
Interview: Exploring the Delhi University Cow Dung Classroom Controversy with Sustainability Expert Dr. Aruna Sharma
By News Journalist, Archyde
Introduction
The recent spotlight on Laxmibai College at Delhi University, following Principal Pratyush Vatsala’s application of cow dung to classroom walls, has ignited a global discussion.To delve deeper into the sustainability aspects, environmental impact, and broader implications, Archyde News spoke with Dr. Aruna Sharma, a leading expert in enduring building practices and environmental policy. Dr. Sharma holds a Ph.D. in environmental Engineering and has consulted extensively with both government and private sector organizations.
The Interview
Archyde: Dr. Sharma, thank you for joining us.This cow dung application at Delhi University has certainly raised eyebrows. From a sustainability perspective, what are your initial thoughts?
Dr. Sharma: Thank you for having me. Initially, it’s a engaging case. The intention might be to explore conventional cooling methods, which is commendable.However, from a sustainability standpoint, it’s complex. Cow dung is a renewable resource, and in certain rural contexts, it can be a practical, locally sourced material. However, its efficacy as a primary cooling solution in a modern educational setting like Delhi University is debatable and requires careful evaluation.
Archyde: the article mentions the principal’s rationale of cooling the classrooms naturally. Can cow dung truly offer a viable option to modern cooling systems?
Dr. Sharma: The cooling effect, if any, would be modest. Cow dung does have some insulating properties, and in hot, dry climates, it can perhaps help reduce heat transfer to some degree. Though, the effectiveness depends heavily on factors like the thickness of the coating, the climate’s humidity levels, and even the ventilation within the classroom. Scientific data comparing cow dung’s cooling effectiveness to modern systems like high-efficiency HVAC or even passive methods, such as cool roofs, is crucial.
Archyde: The article references concerns about hygiene and the perception of the institution. how do these factors weigh in against a stated commitment to sustainability?
Dr. Sharma: This is a critical concern. sustainability is not solely about the environmental impact; it also incorporates social and economic dimensions. Hygiene is paramount in any educational environment. Odor, and the risk of attracting pests, are valid concerns. furthermore,the perception of a learning environment can indeed impact students,potential employers and the University’s reputation.A well-rounded approach must meticulously balance the environmental benefits with the potential for negative social outcomes.
Archyde: There are comparisons with practices in the United States. In the US context, what alternative sustainable cooling methods are popular and effective?
dr. Sharma: The U.S. has a wide range of sustainable cooling methods. Cool roofs, which reflect sunlight, are popular in states with intense summers. Passive solar design, proper insulation, and landscaping with shade trees are also widely adopted. Energy-efficient HVAC systems are, of course, common, but the focus is increasingly on optimizing energy consumption and minimizing environmental impact through advanced technologies and holistic building design.
Archyde: What are the ethical and academic responsibilities involved, when a principal undertakes research like this?
Dr. Sharma: The academic integrity and ethical responsibilities are ample. While experimentation and research are significant, there should be openness, informed consent (from any students or staff involved), and a thorough review process to address any potential risks. It’s essential the university ensures a sound,impartial evaluation of the experiment’s effectiveness and ethical implications before any large-scale deployment.
Archyde: Where should the line be drawn to promote sustainable innovation without compromising other critically important factors?
Dr. sharma: The ideal is to promote innovation and sustainability while safeguarding student well-being,while also upholding academic standards. Transparency, open communication, peer review, and a balanced approach are vital. Further in-depth scientific research into the benefits and impacts is necessary before any widespread adoption. It should always start with comprehensive data and data before execution.
Archyde: Dr. Sharma, what lingering question do you have regarding this episode?
Dr. Sharma: I would be fascinated to no what specific performance indicators, benchmarks, and safety checks were in place to determine if the cow dung application proved effective, and what impact it had on the environmental conditions of the classrooms. Moreover, I think a valuable exercise would be to compare this to other sustainable methods for cooling classrooms. I encourage open, informed debate.
Conclusion
Archyde: Thank you Dr. Sharma for the insights.
Dr. Sharma: My pleasure.
The Delhi University incident serves as a reminder of the need to carefully incorporate established practices with innovative sustainable methods, while responsibly considering the broader implications. Balancing tradition with modern standards could determine the long-term success of initiatives in the evolving world.