“In the interest of the Islamic Republic in Iran, all interests stand,” according to active sources on the Lebanese Gulf line, stressing that “Lebanon, with its people, interests, sovereignty and dignity, becomes a small detail that does not deserve an iota of attention, or even a slight note, from the Secretary-General of Hezbollah Hassan Nasrallah, in order to serve the great project.”
And the same sources consider, in an interview with the Lebanese Forces website, that “Nasrallah did not cut directly, with his violent attack with loud voice and hurtful phrases, on Tuesday evening, once morest Saudi Arabia and its king and crown prince, the remaining fragile hair of connection that Prime Minister Najib Mikati was trying hard to maintain and strengthen in the The recent period with the Gulf states, especially Saudi Arabia, and perhaps he fired the fatal bullet of mercy at the government and its president and made it into news.”
And she believes, “Nasrallah has deepened the catastrophe that Lebanon is experiencing to unimaginable depths, with the natural expectation of the kingdom’s intransigence towards Lebanon more in response to Nasrallah’s abuse, and the economic repercussions,” expressing regret that “what industrialists, farmers and exporters had hoped for, From the success of attempts to contain the situation and address the recent crisis with the Gulf countries, especially Saudi Arabia, it has become like an impossible dream.”
The sources indicated that “the first signs of the Saudi response came through a tweet by the Kingdom’s ambassador in Beirut, in which he described Nasrallah as (the father of the age), expecting that “the pace of Saudi responses will escalate in the coming days.”
She says, “There is no doubt that President Michel Aoun is in an unenviable situation, and perhaps his delay in trying to wash his hands from the position of his ally, until midday yesterday, Tuesday, by affirming his keenness on Lebanon’s Arab and international relations, especially with the Gulf states, led by Saudi Arabia, reflects The predicament he is facing. Aoun cannot absolve himself of his strong strategic alliance and his distinguished relationship with Nasrallah, and he is the one who covered him and protected his weapons and kept silent regarding his prolonged attacks on the kingdom, at least since the Mar Mikhael agreement in 2006, all the way to directly threatening the security of Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in recent years.
As for Mikati’s response, the sources believe that “the position of the prime minister may be more critical, due to several considerations, which may have prompted him to be the first to respond to Nasrallah as soon as his speech ended. But is it sufficient to consider that what Nasrallah said regarding the kingdom does not represent the position of the Lebanese government, and that while he is calling for Hezbollah to be part of the diverse Lebanese situation and of Lebanese affiliation, his leadership contradicts this approach with positions that harm the Lebanese first and Lebanon’s relations with its brothers secondly, reminding him of his calls To adopt a permanent disassociation from Arab disputes and not to harm Lebanon’s relations with Arab countries, especially Saudi Arabia, in order to close the gates of hell that Nasrallah had opened, and to satisfy the Kingdom as if nothing had happened?”
From the point of view of the same sources, “things are much more complicated than that. Nasrallah himself did not hide this time that he knew what his stances would inflict on Lebanon of double woes, and he said, “Bite my tongue… I know that the resurrection will take place tomorrow, and they will say it will ruin our relations with Saudi Arabia.” Therefore, his positions are not improvisational, and cannot be separated from the Iranian agenda in the region. Between Iran’s interest and Lebanon’s, Nasrallah declares once more without hesitation that he is (a small soldier in the Wali al-Faqih Army) and carries out orders with integrity.
In light of this, the same sources express their “regret for the loss of the opportunity provided by the last meeting, between French President Emmanuel Macron and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, in Riyadh, where it was agreed to establish a trust fund for humanitarian aid for Lebanon, provided the Lebanese state is firm in its decision and possesses its sovereignty and to stop the attacks on the Kingdom emanating from its lands, which Mikati was working to meet and expand the scope of aid to something more than humanitarian, before Nasrallah blew up all Mikati’s efforts.”
The sources affirm, “All these hopes have been lost, with the state’s weakness towards the continuation of the abuses and targeting of the Kingdom by Hezbollah. It is obvious that Riyadh is no longer concerned with the issuance of official positions condemning Nasrallah’s words, as long as there are no actions or deterrence.
And she expresses her “fear of additional Saudi strictness towards Lebanon, which desperately needs any breath of oxygen to help it withstand in the face of the crisis.” But unfortunately, the agenda and concerns of the Secretary-General of Hezbollah are elsewhere, in Tehran. While the Lebanese state, from the top of its pyramid, appears to be either complicit, helpless, or negligent, and the Lebanese are paying the price, leaving their fate behind,” she stressed, stressing that “there is no solution to get out of this cycle, except by changing the ruling class from its foundation.”
Any copying without mentioning the source exposes its owner to legal prosecution
